On Tuesday, Trai recommended amending the existing system of permits to include two categories of CLS locations. These include the main facility and the fibre distribution point, known as the ‘point of presence’ (PoP) in the industry.
However, owners of CLS-PoPs will be required to fulfil all other security and regulatory/licence obligations. These include reporting requirements.
In an important move, Trai has said that a section should be added in the upcoming Telecom Bill to promote, protect and prioritise ‘CLS’ and ’submarine cable’ in India.
Damage to sub-sea infra has been recommended to be considered as damage to critical infrastructure of national importance, and is to be strictly dealt under the Indian laws.
By the end of 2022, there were 15 international subsea cables landing in 14 distinct cable landing stations in five cities across India. These were in Mumbai, Chennai, Kochi, Tuticorin and Thiruvananthapuram, according to Submarinenetwork.com, an industry news website.
The full traffic-carrying capability, called lit capacity, and the activated capacity on these international subsea cables were 123.87 tera bytes per second (tbps) and 83.8 tbps, respectively, by end-2021.
“Trai’s recommendations herald a new era for big data, global tech companies, data centres and content delivery networks, among others. With focus on promoting the laying of submarine cables and addressing ambiguities in the legal and regulatory framework for CLS and licences, these entities may be able to unlock the full potential of cross-border data flow. It will fuel innovation and fortify India’s position as a data powerhouse,” said Harsh Walia, partner at legal firm Khaitan & Co.
The recommendations may foster collaboration between submarine consortiums and telecom service providers in India. It may bring the much-needed clarity on ownership of CLS, he added. These include connectivity of terminal equipment to PoPs and power feeders, domestic submarine cables, stub cables and vessel repair.
The industry now awaits the adoption of these recommendations into the legal and regulatory framework.
Bharti Airtel (3)
Reliance Jio (2),
Vodafone idea (1)
Sify Technologies (1)

